Luet oppimateriaalin englanninkielistä versiota. Mainitsit kuitenkin taustakyselyssä
osaavasi suomea. Siksi suosittelemme, että käytät suomenkielistä versiota, joka on
testatumpi ja hieman laajempi ja muutenkin mukava.
Suomenkielinen materiaali kyllä esittelee englanninkielisetkin termit. Myös
suomenkielisessä materiaalissa käytetään ohjelmaprojektien koodissa englanninkielisiä
nimiä kurssin alkupään johdantoesimerkkejä lukuunottamatta.
Voit vaihtaa kieltä A+:n valikon yläreunassa olevasta painikkeesta. Tai tästä:
About This Page
Questions Answered: What higher-order methods do Strings have?
Can I write an algorithm that operates on strings? My friend claims
to be good at Hangman; how can I teach them a lesson?
Topics: Additional practice on implementing algorithms, strings,
Maps, and higher-order methods.
What Will I Do? Program, once you work out what the program is
supposed to do. A single programming assignment makes up most of
Rough Estimate of Workload:? Four hours? You don’t need to
write a great amount of code, but it will take time to get to know
the program’s domain, come up with a solution, translate the solution
into code, and test the program. Don’t get stuck; ask for help.
Points Available: C90.
Related Projects: Peeveli (new).
The facts listed below should be already familiar. Revisit the earlier chapters or
the Scala Reference for details as needed.
Since Strings are collections, they also have many familiar higher-order methods.
Let’s use foreach to print each of a string’s elements (characters):
Now let’s take a longer string and filter out everything but lower-case letters. We’ll
be assisted by the isLower method on Chars:
"Let's offroad!".filter( _.isLower )res0: String = etsoffroad
sorted sorts characters as per their natural ordering (Chapter 9.2), which is defined
"Let's offroad!".sortedres1: String = " !'Ladeffoorst"
With sortBy, we can — for instance — sort the letters by their lower-case
"Let's offroad!".sortBy( _.toLower )res2: String = " !'adeffLoorst"
The map method constructs its return value by applying its parameter function to each
character in the string. Here are a couple of examples:
"Let's offroad!".map( char => if (char.isLower) char.toUpper else char.toLower )res3: String = lET'S OFFROAD!
"Hi!".map( _.isLower )res4: IndexedSeq[Boolean] = Vector(false, true, false)
A, I, and N have been correctly guessed. Five guesses have
missed the mark, so the riddler has drawn a stick figure with
1) a head, 2) a body, 3, 4) two arms, and 5) a leg. The next
incorrect guess means the second leg is drawn and the guesser
Hangman is a classic word game for two: one player — the riddler — picks a word
and the other player — the guesser — tries to figure out what the word is, guessing one
letter at a time. The length of the word is known to both players. Each time the guesser
picks a letter, the riddler must reveal all those positions in the target word where that
letter appears. If the letter doesn’t appear in the target word at all, the guess is a
miss and the riddler draws an additional element into a line drawing of a hanging stick
If the guesser misses a few times, the drawing will be completed and the guesser
loses the game. The guesser wins in case they manage to reveal the entire word.
That’s pretty much all there is to it, but you can read up on the game in Wikipedia if you like.
There are many digital variants of Hangman in which the computer takes the role of the
riddler and the human player is the guesser. Just like the traditional pen-and-paper
version, these variants are based on the premise that the guesser can trust the riddler.
Our take on Hangman is different. In the game we’re about to program, the riddler
is something called Peeveli, and it doesn’t play fair.
In a regular game of Hangman, the riddler picks the target word at the start of the game
and scrupulously reveals letters as the correct answers accumulate. But what if the riddler
Imagine the scene. The game has just started, you are the guesser, and the riddler
has just — unbeknownst to you — picked the target word BAZAAR. The concealed word
initially looks like this:
_ _ _ _ _ _
If you now guess A, the riddler should reveal three copies of that letter. But they could
instead mentally switch their original target word for an A-less one — BELIEF is an
example — and inform you that there is no A and your guess is a miss.
Imagine another scene. You’ve managed to guess all but one of the letters in this
five-letter word, but the next incorrect guess with lose you the game.
_ A S I S
Suppose you haven’t guessed the letters B and O yet. There are only two possible answers:
BASIS and OASIS. However, if you pick B, the riddler can claim they were thinking of
OASIS — and vice versa. You can’t beat the dishonest riddler!
The name Peeveli
“Peeveli” is an archaic Finnish word for the Devil. It derives from
the Old Swedish “böfvel”, which additionally meant a hangman. These
days, the Finnish word
is comparatively rare and is employed almost exclusively as a
semi-humorous exclamation or very mild curse. The name of our game
thus captures the diabolical nature of our virtual gallows expert
as well as, perhaps, the reaction of the exasperated guesser.
In the game of Peeveli, the computer is the riddler and the human player is the
guesser. The game is challenging because the computer cheats methodically. It uses a vast
vocabulary in combination with a devious algorithm: it doesn’t actually pick a target
word at all, instead keeping track of all the existing words that continue to be plausible
correct solutions, given the previous guesses and the letters already revealed as a
consequence. Whenever the player guesses a letter, Peeveli tries to keep its options
open: it selects which (if any) letters to reveal so that there are as many potential
solutions left as possible.
Imagine a scenario with you as the riddler. The target word is supposed to have four
letters. Further imagine that there are no four-letter words in English apart from the ten
listed below. The target word must therefore be one of those ten.
ALSO AREA AUNT GURU HAWK IDEA JUJU PLAY TUNA ZERO
Your opponent’s first guess is the letter A. What should you do?
First, you should see where the A’s appear in the list of known four-letter words.
Now you can identify a few groups of words with different patterns of A’s in them:
This basically means that you need to pick one of six alternatives. A good basic strategy
is to pick the largest group, which in this instance is the last one. So you inform your
opponent that the word has no A’s and memorize the fact that there are three plausible
solutions left: GURU, JUJU, and ZERO.
If the vocabulary had additionally contained APEX and ARMY, which begin with an A, the
group A___ would have been the largest. In that scenario, you would have revealed the
initial A and memorized the plausible solutions ALSO, APEX, ARMY, and AUNT.
The art of deception
In this chapter, we’ll always use the basic strategy of picking
the largest group. If you wish, you can reflect on why that isn’t
always optimal and how you might come up with even craftier algorithms.
Suppose you’ve chosen the group with GURU, JUJU, and ZERO, and your opponent’s next
guess is the letter U. This results in the groups _U_U (with GURU and JUJU) and
____ (with ZERO). The former is larger, so you tell your opponent there are U’s in
the second and fourth slots.
Whenever your opponent guesses a letter that doesn’t appear in any of the plausible
solutions, you have only a single group that encompasses all the words that remain.
Obviously, you’ll then pick that group.
Occasionally, you’ll find that there are multiple groups of equal size. In such cases,
you could pick an arbitrary group or break the tie by choosing the group that reveals the
The Peeveli game doesn’t draw a hanging figure; it tallies missed
guesses by displaying letters in red. The letters start appearing
when the player has only a small number of incorrect guesses left.
The project Peeveli contains a partial implementation of the game described above.
The GUI is in working order but the riddler is sorely lacking in smarts.
In the description of Peeveli’s algorithm, above, we mentioned
that when word groups are equal in size, it might be a good idea
to pick the group that reveals fewer letters to the guesser.
This is completely optional. Implement that additional bit of
schemery only if you want an additional challenge. For the official
assignment, you can pick any of the equally sized groups.
A+ presents the exercise submission form here.
Assignment unavailable in English
In the Finnish edition of this ebook, there is an optional assignment here that
involves the Finnish language. This assignment is unfortunately not available in
Please note that this section must be completed individually.
Even if you worked on this chapter with a pair, each of you should submit the form separately.
Time spent: (*) Required
Please estimate the total number of minutes you spent on this chapter (reading, assignments,
etc.). You don’t have to be exact, but if you can produce an estimate to within 15 minutes or
half an hour, that would be great.
Written comment or question:
You aren’t required to give written feedback. Nevertheless, please
do ask something, give feedback, or reflect on your learning!
(However, the right place to ask urgent questions about programs
that you’re currently working on isn’t this form but Piazza or the
lab sessions. We can’t guarantee that anyone will even see anything
you type here before the weekly deadline.)
Thousands of students have given feedback that has contributed to this ebook’s design.
Weeks 1 to 13 of the ebook, including the assignments and weekly bulletins, have been
written in Finnish and translated into English by Juha Sorva.
Weeks 14 to 20 are by Otto Seppälä. That part of the ebook isn’t available during the
fall term, but we’ll publish it when it’s time.
The appendices (glossary, Scala reference,
FAQ, etc.) are by Juha Sorva unless otherwise specified on the page.
The automatic assessment of the assignments has been programmed by Riku Autio, Jaakko
Kantojärvi, Teemu Lehtinen, Timi Seppälä, Teemu Sirkiä, and Aleksi Vartiainen.
The illustrations at the top of each chapter, and the similar drawings elsewhere in the
ebook, are the work of Christina Lassheikki.
The animations that detail the execution Scala programs have been designed by Juha Sorva and
Teemu Sirkiä. Teemu Sirkiä and Riku Autio have done the technical implementation, relying on
Teemu’s Jsvee and Kelmu
The other diagrams and interactive presentations in the ebook are by Juha Sorva.
The O1Library software
has been developed by Aleksi Lukkarinen and Juha Sorva. Several of its key components
are built upon Aleksi’s SMCL
The pedagogy of using tools from O1Library (such as Pic) for simple graphical programming
is inspired by the textbooks How to Design Programs by Flatt, Felleisen, Findler, and
Krishnamurthi and Picturing Programs by Stephen Bloch.
The course platform A+ has been created by
Aalto’s LeTech research group and is largely
developed by students. The current lead developer is Jaakko Kantojärvi; many other
students of computer science and information networks are also active on the project.
For O1’s current teaching staff, please see Chapter 1.1.
Peeveli is a derivative of a similar programming assignment designed by Keith Schwarz.